When comparing the true cost of “as-a-service” versus traditional IT models, it’s important to consider the cost of internal resources. This includes the time and effort required to maintain and manage traditional IT systems in-house, as well as the potential costs of hiring additional staff or training existing staff to manage these systems.
Traditional Models
With traditional IT models, businesses typically need to invest in hardware, software, and other IT infrastructure, as well as hire IT staff to manage and maintain these systems. This can be a significant cost, as it often requires a large upfront investment in capital expenditures, ongoing maintenance costs, and the cost of hiring and training IT staff.
As-a-Service
In contrast, “as-a-service” models often involve lower upfront costs, as businesses can pay for IT services on a monthly or yearly basis rather than investing in expensive hardware and software upfront. Additionally, as-a-service providers often handle maintenance and support, reducing the need for businesses to hire additional staff or spend time managing IT systems internally.
While as-a-service models may involve ongoing subscription fees, businesses can often benefit from significant cost savings over time by outsourcing IT services to a third-party provider. This can free up internal resources, allowing businesses to focus on their core competencies and strategic objectives rather than spending time and money managing IT infrastructure.
The cost of internal resources is an important factor to consider when comparing the true cost of as-a-service versus traditional IT models. While traditional IT models may involve significant upfront investments and ongoing maintenance costs, as-a-service models can offer lower upfront costs and greater flexibility, allowing businesses to optimise their IT spending and focus on their core competencies.
